Happy Thanksgiving
![]() | |
| Thanksgiving Turkey | Dominic Armato |
This year's turkey courtesy of Leslie Scudiere.
« August 2008 | Main | December 2008 »
![]() | |
| Thanksgiving Turkey | Dominic Armato |
This year's turkey courtesy of Leslie Scudiere.
We have a contender for weepiest departure ever.
Not to come down too hard on Richard. He seemed like a nice fellow. But you can't combine graham crackers, sliced bananas, melted chocolate and marshmallow fluff and expect to stick around, regardless of the conditions.
And speaking of the conditions... well... I suppose there will always be episodes like this. *sigh*
Rankings most likely on Monday... maybe Tuesday due to the holiday (depends on how late we get back Sunday night).
Have a great T-Day, everybody!
![]() |
PLEASE READ BEFORE COMMENTING!!!
There's a lot of sneaky intel out there, especially this season, but I'm endeavoring to keep this blog a spoiler-free zone. This isn't just for the readers, but for me, too -- I don't want to know what happens! As such, anything that's already been broadcast or has been posted on the official Bravo site is fair game for discussion, but if you've heard rumors that one chef has been hosting a lot of dinner parties, or that another chef was spotted boarding a plane to an exotic locale, please keep them to yourself... thanks!
Who are these people and what have they done with my Top Chef cast?!?
Fighting over who gets to do dessert? Did I miss something? For a couple of years now, we've been chiding the contestants for not having a dessert recipe or two up their sleeves. Now it's like they all studied up and when the first opportunity presented itself, they fell all over themselves trying to show they were prepared. Odd.
Odd week in general, really. One of the first things we learned is that the editors have finally figured out how plainly they've been telegraphing the results. Used to be you had a pretty good idea who was getting the axe within the first five minutes of the show. Nervous about how the number of chefs is dwindling? You should be. Feeling like you're finally hitting your stride and looking forward to today's challenge? Yeah, not so much. Thrilled to be bonding with this other chef who's totally making the competition tolerable? She's so gone. But did we hear anything from or about Jill this week? Not a peep.
This marked the second consecutive week we've seen a challenge that totally should have been in Chicago last season, and I was gratified to see nary a chef acting as though the hot dog was beneath him. To be fair, though, nobody actually presented a hot dog except for Jill, and she got hammered for not making her own. But even if the challenge was judged rather loosely and framed with a little superfluous window dressing, it was still a good one. Then we got another very free and open elimination challenge, though some chefs seemed to have issues working even within the context of New American, and Tom seemed to take their efforts rather personally. But his response to Fabio and Jill's dishes served to hammer home and old point. Fabio's Italian carpaccio wins while Jill's quiche is, according to his blog, too French for a New American challenge? Despite the dubious claim in his blog that carpaccio has been absorbed into American cuisine (in a substantively different manner than quiche?), this nicely demonstrates the old Top Chef truism that if you make great food, you can get away with stretching the very same rules that will be used to hammer you if you don't. To be clear, I have no issue with this approach to judging nor with their decisions this week. But it's instructive.
I'd like to briefly address one sentiment I see coming from a lot of bloggers/commenters this week. Between Fabio's carpaccio and Arianne's cherry surprise, we had a couple of very plain admissions from chefs that they were cooking dishes they serve in their restaurants. This seems to be rubbing a lot of people the wrong way, and I just don't understand why. First off, if you don't think every single chef on the show has done the same, sending out dishes -- primarily, even -- that are at least close variations on their tried and true, you're kidding yourself. Second, so what? When these chefs walk through the doors of Top Chef kitchen, are they supposed to forget every great idea they've ever had? Yeah, it's exciting when they come up with something totally on the fly, and sometimes they're forced to do so whether they want to or not. But this isn't Iron Chef. Their mandate is to express themselves through food and articulate their culinary style, not reinvent themselves the moment the competition starts. And to expect them to leave behind everything they've done and created is to ask them to abandon the very thing it is the purpose of the competition to discover. To best determine who is Top Chef, I want to see how these guys improvise and adapt and create, sure. And the challenges ensure that happens. But you can't deny them who they are, and their go-to and signature dishes are a large part of that equation. Don't deny them that.
Tough week to get a handle on the rankings. As is frequently the case this early in the season, we're left with more questions than answers. Aside from Stefan's quickfire stumble, last week's top three went into hiding, our number four had a Jekyll and Hyde week, a couple of contestants who previously looked weak made some noise, and the heart of the pack still failed to distinguish themselves in any meaningful manner. Plus, Lee Anne had the audacity not to post her blog by Sunday night, even after all of the nice things I said about her last week. Thankfully, I don't mind a little rankings volatility in the early part of the season. A couple more weeks and we should have a clearer picture of where everybody belongs.
The power rankings are not purely a prediction of who is most likely to win, or an assessment of last episode's dishes, or a reflection of the contestants' historical performance, but rather a nebulous amalgam of all three, combined with a little bit of gut feeling, to provide a relative measure of current awesomeness.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
MINOR EPISODE THREE SPOILERS AHEAD!!!
Speaking of chefs who do crazy things with a purpose in mind, ladies and gentlemen, Grant Achatz! It's truly a shame that he couldn't make it on the show last season where he really belonged, but the guy obviously had more important things to deal with and it's a gift that he's here, working, and we're able to see him on the show, period. For those who haven't seen the preview, the chefs draw quickfire knives with seemingly random numbers, from the low 40s to the mid 160s. My guess? That's the temperature at which their dish must be served. If so, I love this challenge already, less for its utility than for its philosophy. Ingredients taste different at different temperatures. Hot is not always best, and there are a whole range of temperatures between "hot" and "cold" at which food can be served. And even though this'll probably just devolve into a hot dish / cold dish challenge, it will be very telling to see which chefs get it. Also, they'd better be careful. If they think they're going to impress Grant Achatz with some funky technique, they'd better know what they're doing. I've eaten at Alinea, and Achatz isn't just doing crazy for crazy's sake. He's one of the wackiest guys out there, but his wild techniques and presentations have real thought and purpose behind them. He won't be buffaloed because something's "cool". There's also some total curveball that's thrown at the contestants about 15 minutes into their prep time, but I have absolutely no idea what it could be.
The elimination challenge has all of the earmarks of something that's going to irritate me. Thrown outside at the last minute, cooking in terrible conditions? I understand the whole "you have to roll with the punches" thing, but c'mon. Somebody's going home who probably doesn't deserve it. At least not for what they did that day. Interestingly, the teaser seemed to clearly show who the bottom three are. I won't name them, but it'll be interesting to see if that's how it actually shakes out, or if this is more misdirection.
As always, looking forward to Wednesday.
Let me get this straight.
There's a restaurant in Baltimore that's casual but classy, serves an inexpensive menu full of homey but creative comfort food, is totally laid back and welcomes kids to the point that you can sit at a table next to a play area with a sofa, easel, tons of books and toys... and you guys didn't tell me???
Regular dining out has returned to our household. More after I've had a chance to sample a few more items.
![]() | |
| Bread and Butter | Dominic Armato |
Midrange dining in Baltimore has been exceptionally good to us lately, not to mention more frequent. We've still had fewer opportunities in a year and half than we could on a week long vacation, but I call two nights out in three months progress. Our trip to Woodberry Kitchen actually predated my excursion to Salt, coming on the last day of August when grandma was visiting, available for toddler-sitting, and my ladylove and I were in the mood for something homey and comforting. What we got was exactly what we expected, just better than we expected.
![]() | ||
| Warm Peaches with Olive Oil and Salt | Dominic Armato | |
![]() | ||
| Deviled Eggs with Chipped Ham | Dominic Armato | |
![]() | ||
| Potted Pork | Dominic Armato | |
![]() | ||
| Ham, Nectarine and Gouda Flatbread | Dominic Armato | |
![]() | ||
| Hanger Steak with Creamed Corn | Dominic Armato | |
![]() | ||
| Lamb Shoulder with Blackberry Sauce | Dominic Armato | |
![]() | ||
| Chocolate Cake | Dominic Armato | |
![]() | ||
| Peach and Berry Cobbler | Dominic Armato | |
We came away -- waddled away -- very impressed and anxious to return. We had a couple of misses, but they weren't so numerous or so significant that they detracted from a great meal. Though Gjerde's menu certainly isn't without its creative and unconventional touches, at heart this is very simple, honest food that's elevated just a touch and prepared exceptionally well. When you work as hard as he has to source great, fresh, seasonal ingredients, the best thing you can do is get out of their way, and that's precisely what he does. Woodberry Kitchen is warm, it's comfy, and between the size of the menu and its constant rotation, there's a lot to explore. It isn't so much an occasion restaurant as the kind of place where I'd love to have a standing reservation, returning on a regular basis and expecting a simple, satisfying meal every time. Just maybe not this big every time.
| Woodberry Kitchen | |
| www.woodberrykitchen.com | |
| 2010 Clipper Park Road, No. 126 | |
| Baltimore, MD 21211 | |
| 410-464-8000 | |
| Sun - Thu | 5:00 PM - 10:00 PM |
| Fri - Sat | 5:00 PM - 11:00 PM |
Today's post is running just a wee bit late (a day at most), so here's a little taste to tide you over.
![]() |
"I'm not sure it explains why they'd be such difficult critics. Other chefs, I think, having been on the firing line themselves, tend to prefer to be supportive rather than critical."
Shows what I know.
Well, I had Ariane's banner halfway done when Jill got the dreaded PPYKAG (and then it took me 20 minutes to get a decent screenshot of Jill because she wouldn't keep her farking head still in the exit interview... but I digress). Going to be very curious to hear what the blogs have to say this week. My suspicion is this is one of those episodes where a lot of criticism was left on the editing room floor to maintain suspense. Somebody at the table -- don't remember who -- mentioned that the quiche tasted like glue, to general agreement.
Can't say I was terribly enthused about Jill, but I did think she'd hang on a little longer than this.
Thoughts?
![]() | |
| The McRib | Photo Courtesy of Gary Wiviott |
No, I didn't spend the three month layoff in Des Plaines, Illinois undergoing intense psychological reprogramming in a bunker beneath McDonald's HQ. But today, I'm going to stand up for the McRib. And not just for the McRib, but for that which the McRib represents, though we'll get to that later. This discussion starts with the discovery not only of the fact that I dig the crime against food pictured above, but that I'm far from alone... even among otherwise discerning food nerds.
With the most recent reintroduction of the sandwich to the Chicago market (are boneless pigs in season again?), an old thread over at LTH Forum, started two years ago by one Mr. Gary Wiviott in a moment of exasperation, was bumped back into action. Gary, you see, is a hardcore BBQ enthusiast, and not of the "slather a grilled chicken breast or boiled ribs with ketchup and liquid smoke and call it BBQ" variety. No, Gary's a true devotee of the low and slow method of turning meat into succulent, smoky bliss that is, along with jazz, one of the few true American art forms. As such, what surprised me about the thread wasn't Gary's violent reaction to the reappearance of his nemesis. Though he's able to maintain good humor about the subject, I've no doubt that on a deep, emotional level, Gary sees the McRib as an affront to all that is good and true in this twisted, cruel world. His reaction was (and is, every time the McRib resurfaces) entirely predictable, and the thread is certainly not lacking for like-minded individuals. Less expected, however, was the outpouring of self-loathing love for the meaty monstrosity that also followed.
![]() | ||
| White Castle's Chicken Rings | ||
The answer, I think, is in the moniker Gary chose to attach to the object of his scorn: The McFib.
Personally, I find the McRib's lack of real food qualities to be rather endearing. But there was a level on which I could completely sympathize. I've been similarly afflicted by a burning hatred for The Olive Garden since first visiting them in high school. But when I reflect upon the true root of my scorn, I'm forced to admit that it has nothing to do with the food. It's terrible, sure, but... well... look up. I'm in no position to throw stones. Rather, what burns me every time I see an Olive Garden ad is that it's being presented as authentic Italian cuisine that's lovingly prepared by chefs who have trained in Tuscany. It's the lie that gets me. So for a hardcore 'cue nerd, what's not to hate about the McRib? It's a meat patty slathered in sauce. There's no smoke. There are no ribs. Hell, I'm not even entirely certain the thing is made of pork. Yet I've no doubt that over the next month, the River North McDonald's will sell more fake ribs than all of the south side BBQ shrines combined will sell real ones. For a huge segment of the population, the McRib IS BBQ. And that chaps Gary's ass.
The thing is, in this golden age of irony and self-awareness, it doesn't need to be this way. McDonald's could take a cue (no pun intended) from White Castle in embracing the McRib's fakeness. Why go through the pretense of making the patty vaguely rib-shaped? White Castle had the right idea with its Chicken Rings. If you're going to process something so thoroughly into oblivion that it can't possibly hope to resemble the original beast in any way, why not embrace the fakeitude and make it the most unnatural shape possible? I, for one, think they should stamp the McDonald's logo into the patty, shape it like the silhouette of a cartoon pig and call it the McVaguelyPorkish. All absurd questions of authenticity fully preempted, we'll be free to simply enjoy the sandwich for what it is: processed, fused meat paste in a sickly sweet sauce. It won't be any closer to actual BBQ, but it'll be honest. And perhaps more importantly, it will help us to be honest with ourselves. As food nerds, we can labor all day over the perfect Ragu alla Bolognese, we can scour the nation's strip malls in search of that undiscovered gem of an ethnic restaurant, we can travel thousands of miles for fleeting moments of gastronomic bliss unattainable at home... and then we can have a McRib. Without feeling guilty about it.
![]() |
PLEASE READ BEFORE COMMENTING!!!
There's a lot of sneaky intel out there, especially this season, but I'm endeavoring to keep this blog a spoiler-free zone. This isn't just for the readers, but for me, too -- I don't want to know what happens! As such, anything that's already been broadcast or has been posted on the official Bravo site is fair game for discussion, but if you've heard rumors that one chef has been hosting a lot of dinner parties, or that another chef was spotted boarding a plane to an exotic locale, please keep them to yourself... thanks!
Couldn't have been much happier with that start!
Strong field of competitors, great challenges, very little in the way of technical flubs (impressive for the first episode) and a cameo by my personal hero. Tom seems to feel we're in for a great season, and thus far I'm inclined to agree.
Speaking of Tom, it's widely believed that he is the one person the loss of whom the show couldn't survive. And while it's true that he'd probably be the most difficult to replace (unless Bourdain decided to clear his calendar), I'm increasingly of the opinion that the show's silent star is Lee Anne Wong, under whose direction the culinary challenges and setups -- the real substance of the show -- have become increasingly compelling, meaningful and less gimmicky with every passing season since she came on board. What we got this week were two perfect challenges. First, a elimination series following a natural progression from brute prep to refined prep to actual cooking, all centered on an ingredient that was a corny yet appropriate reference to the new setting. Eliminating somebody right off the bat was, indeed, a little harsh, but the structure of the quickfire made it less arbitrary, I thought. First, you could peel your way out of elimination. Failing that, you could chop your way out of elimination. Failing that, you could cook your way out of elimination. And if you couldn't do that, well, it's a little harder to write it off as a fluke, isn't it? Then the elimination challenge resurrects the great head-to-head format that kicked off last season, this time simultaneously introducing us to the city's ethnic neighborhoods. I'm sure this season will have its share of groaners, but you can't argue with this start.
It's looking like an interesting field this time around. As Lee Anne put it in her blog, there are no Marcels or Hungs or Blaises -- no wild, showy technicians who demand attention. It's almost a bit of a throwback to season one in that respect, where the cream of the crop were creative but restrained. It should make for a tight competition, and it also makes handicapping a little tougher than usual in the early going. For those who didn't read last season, the power rankings aren't strictly a prediction of who is most likely to win, or an assessment of last episode's dishes, or a reflection of the contestants' historical performance, but rather a nebulous amalgam of all three, combined to provide a relative measure of current awesomeness. And so, without further ado, let's get to the rankings.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Two down, fourteen to go! We've already eliminated some chaff, and I'd say we have another 3-4 weeks to go before the eliminations start to get interesting, and another 4-6 weeks before we start to care about them. That time should give us the opportunity to get to know who the real contenders are, and a little more about them.
MINOR EPISODE 2 SPOILERS AHEAD!!!
Looking at the previews for next week, we already have a pretty good idea of what the challenges will be. The quickfire has been laid bare, and I'm kind of digging the hot dog challenge. It's not a bad blank slate for a downscale challenge, and being a Chicagoan, I consider the hot dog to be a perfectly noble foodstuff, high falutin' elevation notwithstanding. This is a challenge that will show us which contestants are the open-minded food lovers, and which are the snobby elitists.
As for the elimination, the details are sketchy. We know it's high volume, so the caterers might have a leg up (I guess Carla probably lives to see episode three), but it's the mystery over the crowd that has me curious. We're told they'll be serving 50, that they'll be really, really tough critics, and Carla describes them as "jealous". I don't think it'll be a panel of previously eliminated contestants, first because they'd have to wrangle up nearly all of them, and second because it would be prohibitively expensive to fly them all in. I think it's possible that it'll be rejected New York area applicants, which would explain the jealousy line, but I'm not sure it explains why they'd be such difficult critics. Other chefs, I think, having been on the firing line themselves, tend to prefer to be supportive rather than critical. More likely, I'm thinking they've assembled a crowd of food bloggers/posters, and Carla's trotting out the tired, ignorant trope that we all just like to sit at home tearing chefs apart because we're malicious souls who are jealous that they can cook and we can't. But that can't be it. Surely, they would have invited me, right?
Right?
:-)
Discuss!
![]() | |
| Foie Gras & Kobe Beef Slider | Dominic Armato |
A few months ago, a thought occurred to me. Charm City Hounds has been such a great group, and we've hit some outstanding places, but while the bastard stepchild of Chowhound's Baltimore board was borne of the "combing the strip malls and back alleys in search of under-the-radar grub" philosophy -- one I lovingly embrace and strive to practice constantly -- why be dogmatic about it? There is, indeed, nothing like falling into a place like Grace Garden, feasting almost weekly with great company on outstanding ethnic cuisine, and then watching a previously unknown gem receive glowing write up after glowing write up from the mainstream press as word trickles out. But as much as discoveries like that drive us, ethnic holes-in-the-wall don't hold the monopoly on deliciousness. One thing I suppose I am dogmatic about is the belief that great grub exists at all price points and all levels of refinement, and delicious food deserves our respect independent of how much it costs or where we obtain it. So I figured, hey, just for kicks, why don't we see how everybody cleans up and I'll organize an outing to one of the swankier Baltimore eateries that have been languishing on my to-do list for months? And while I don't anticipate that this type of outing will (or should) become common for CCH, it turned out to be a good call.
![]() | ||
| Scallop Ceviche | Dominic Armato | |
![]() | ||
| Foie Gras & Kobe Beef Slider | Dominic Armato | |
![]() | ||
| Cape May Fluke | Dominic Armato | |
![]() | ||
| Steak 'n Eggs | Dominic Armato | |
![]() | ||
| Ice Cream | Dominic Armato | |
![]() | ||
| Cookie Jar | Dominic Armato | |
| Salt | ||
| www.salttavern.com | ||
| 2127 E. Pratt Street | ||
| Baltimore, MD 21231 | ||
| 410-276-5480 | ||
| Mon | 5:00 PM - 10:00 PM | Bar closes at 11:00 |
| Tue - Wed | 5:00 PM - 10:00 PM | Bar closes at 12:00 |
| Thu - Sat | 5:00 PM - 11:00 PM | Bar closes at 1:00 |
![]() |
Comments