June 23, 2010

Top Chef - S7E2 Postmortem

Does anybody else think this season is full of some serious overachievers? I mean, it's only episode two, and they're already sniping at a midseason level! Somehow I don't see this group getting less contentious. Could be an ugly season. Cripes, even the winners are at each other's throats.

On the bright side, nothing like getting the top and bottom to lessen the sting of a rough first week. Thank you, Kelly and Jacqueline.

I'll echo the sentiment of some comments I've already seen. This episode basically managed to cram in every traditional Top Chef annoyance possible. Here's hoping that gets the silliness out of the way for a while. But I'm... uh... not holding my breath.

Rankings Monday. Looks like they'll still be pretty volatile. Gonna need one more good episode before things start to solidify a bit, I think.

Discuss!

June 21, 2010

Top Chef - S7E1 Power Rankings

PLEASE READ BEFORE COMMENTING!!!
As usual, there's a lot of sneaky intel out there, but I'm endeavoring to keep this blog a spoiler-free zone. This isn't just for the readers, but for me, too -- I don't want to know what happens! As such, anything that's already been broadcast or has been posted on the official Bravo site is fair game for discussion. I will, for example, discuss the preview of next week's show at the end of the post. But if you've heard rumors that one chef has been hosting a lot of dinner parties, or that another chef was spotted boarding a plane to an exotic locale, please keep them to yourself.
Also, since this season takes place in DC, there will be politics on the show. To ensure discussion remains friendly and food-focused, let's keep them there, please... thanks!

Well, heck, I thought that was a pretty good start to the season.

Starting off with a prep challenge is becoming tradition at this point, but I have to say, I thought the way they structured it this time around was particularly elegant. A multi-stage knockout guaranteed that only the strongest prep beasts would get the chance to cook for the win, and the manner in which they then used those results to form teams for the elimination was great, and I particularly loved the use of the 17th contestant. Last man standing is, in theory, the biggest perceived threat of those who didn't make it to the cooking phase. Let the winner decide where he goes.

The elimination, too, was perfect as a simple get to know you challenge, even if we didn't actually get to know everybody. It's always frustrating for the first few episodes when there are a few contestants about whom you hear absolutely nothing, and many more about whom you hear very little. And the show's edited pretty tightly. Barring additional time, I'm not sure where you get the few more minutes you'd need to give us more info about some of the dishes. But we at least got to SEE everything, and this is a marked improvement over some previous seasons. So I'm finding it difficult to complain.

Which is why i'm a little surprised to see that there are people so down on season seven already. To those people, I'd like to point out that at this point last season, Ron Duprat had more top elimination finishes than both of the Voltaggi put together. Point simply being, it's early, folks... let's give this a little time before jumping to conclusions.

And now I'm going to jump to some conclusions.

As in previous seasons, there's so little to go on at this point, the rankings are all over the map and probably will be for another episode or two. Until we have a little more data, I'm just kind of slinging people around. And there are a few moves that might look rather surprising except for one important note in Tom's blog. He stated that there was one group of four -- he didn't identify which -- that was uniformly strong. So much so, in fact, that he said they all could have been in contention not only for their group, but for the entire challenge. The question, of course, is which group? Certainly not John or Jacqueline's groups. Which would leave Kenny/Stephen's group or Alex/Timothy's group. This also means that either Timothy's or Stephen's dish wasn't as bad as the edit would have led you to believe. Stephen's group was five rather than four, and I might consider that Tom had simply forgotten one of those groups had an extra contestant, except that the five person group also included Tracey and Ed, both of whom received some on-air criticism. So I think that group has to be Alex/Timothy/Andrea/Tamesha. And that's why you'll see some of them where they are.

Okay, let's do this... on with the rankings!

The power rankings are not purely a prediction of who is most likely to win, or an assessment of last episode's dishes, or a reflection of the contestants' historical performance, but rather a nebulous amalgam of all three, combined with a little bit of gut feeling, to provide a relative measure of current awesomeness.

Wins
Top
Bottom
1 Angelo Quickfires
1
1
0
Last Week: 4 Eliminations
1
1
0

Second-easiest call in the field (the first-easiest was... um... made for me). Win the first two challenges, take the top spot. For his QF, it sounds like Angelo pulled a lot of flavor out of a very simple recipe. The chicken was seasoned with cumin and salt and sautéed. The potatoes were julienned and simmered in vegetable stock with butter. And the jam was onion with curry, sugar and rice vinegar. There's really not much there, but he made a compelling dish out of it, and that says quite a bit. The char wasn't quite as simple from a construction standpoint, but it looks very uncomplicated in terms of flavor. The shallots are pickled with a little vinegar, sugar and ginger. The tapioca is spiced with Kashmir chiles, chipotle chiles and smoked paprika. And the foam is basically just chicken stock that's been simmered with bacon, garlic and thyme before being strained and hit with lecithin. The flavors aren't complicated, but he's doing a lot to bring them out, and they apparently work great together. Sounds an awful lot like his mentor. Only one thing that bugs me about Angelo, though it has to be nothing. Supposedly, he earned a Michelin star running a restaurant in the West Village. As far as I can tell, Yumcha is the only place he's run that's been in the West Village. And I sure can't find where Yumcha was awarded a Michelin star. Yumcha folded pretty quickly (after Angelo had a falling out with ownership and he and the entire line walked out in the middle of service, apparently)... did it do so after the star was awarded but before the book went to press? Or are the online listings omitting Yumcha because it had closed by then? Anybody have a copy of the 2005 or 2006 NYC Michelin guide who can shed a little light on this?

2 Kenny Quickfires
0
1
0
Last Week: 13 Eliminations
0
1
0

Unlike Ron last season, Kenny sure doesn't give the impression that he just happened to start off with an unusually good week. Dude dominated the prep table and put out two interesting and well-received dishes. I'm not quite sure how adding paprika and dill to five-spice powder makes it Moroccan, but hey, the duo of chicken with Moroccan spice went over pretty well. Add a simple onion confit, blend some potato, onion, chicken stock and olive oil to make a coulis, make a little ragout with fiddlehead ferns, dried cherries, pumpkin seeds and honey and voila... a Moroccan-esque near-winner. His elimination dish was even busier. 41 ingredients has to be a Top Chef recipe record (and that's after removing duplicates from separate sections), and it explains why he's so fast at the prep table. He has to be. First you lay down a mole made with black beans, chorizo, pumpkin seeds, chocolate and a horde of chiles and spices. Then a polenta enriched with goat cheese. The trout that's cooked with butter, cilantro and lime, but not before being rubbed with coffee, cinnamon and a bunch of other spices. You make a vinaigrette with chorizo, agave, pumpkin seeds, cinnamon, orange and cherry vinegar, you bake up some garlic tuiles, you add a dollop of tomatillo relish that's made with onions, bell peppers, cilantro, agave, lime and chile powder, and top it all off with some quinoa that you cooked and then fried up crispy. No sweat, right? Gail's first impression wasn't unreasonable. That dish looks like it needs some serious editing. But surprise, it worked. And Kenny's in the second slot.

3 Kevin Quickfires
0
1
0
Last Week: 5 Eliminations
0
1
0

Third spot goes to Kevin. Tom dinged him for a salty broth in the QF, but he was still on top of both challenges and appeared to have redeemed himself with the elimination. And that QF dish didn't look too bad, even if it didn't quite hit. Very conventional flavors -- chicken, onion, potato, garlic, lemon, tomato, mushroom -- but he simmered the chicken wings, then deboned and sautéed them before serving up with the resulting broth. Simple little twist that might've worked, but I'm betting having (and I'm speculating here) Swanson chicken broth rather than chicken stock to work with bit him in the ass. Get used to it, Kevin. It isn't the last consumer product you'll have to use. His elimination dish was also very simple, but the flavors look a lot more compelling to me. Simply cooked lamb, drizzled with a natural jus bolstered with veal stock, and paired with a Meyer lemon and pistachio marmalade with a little slivered spring onions on top. Kevin looks like he'll be around for a while.

4 Alex Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: 11 Eliminations
0
1
0

Alex rounds out the top group and is the other big mover. Unlike the three above him, I don't feel entirely confident that he'll maintain this level, but he was on the top of the elimination and missed being on top of the quickfire by a few seconds, so he'll join the early leaders. The flavors of his deconstructed beet borscht are very, very straightforward. Essentially, it's very simply braised short ribs, a roasted beet puree, some wilted cabbage with a little cherry vinegar and crème fraîche whipped up with some goat cheese. But in deconstructing it, the reimagined soup took another proven form, that of the braised short rib with pureed sauce and soft vegetable. Small wonder it worked, and a simple, smart play on Alex's part.

5 Kelly Quickfires
0
0
1
Last Week: 3 Eliminations
0
0
0

Kelly may have washed out of the first round of the prep race, but I'm reluctant to read too much into an inaugural challenge that required steady hands and had the additional gravity of a $20,000 prize. No doubt some were suffering from opening day jitters. I have Kelly on top of the second tier for garnering some very positive comments, including a blog shout-out from Gail, having the unfortunate luck of being in Angelo's group, and a recipe that looks good to me. Her NY strip was rubbed with fennel pollen and juniper berries, plated with mushrooms, asparagus and fiddlehead ferns, and sauced with a currant-infused port reduction and "Kelly Liken Currant-Lavender Sauce" which makes it sound like she brought her own line of bottled sauces with her. Either that, or she just really likes to use her name which, given the eponymous restaurant, may be the case.

6 Andrea Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: 6 Eliminations
0
0
0

I have Andrea right behind Kelly because she was in Tom's favorite group, her dish seemed to go over rather well, and she also put out a recipe that looks interesting. She makes sautéed potato gnocchi kicked up with ground chorizo, serves them with pork shoulder slow-braised in the usual suspects plus New Mexican chiles and orange juice, and tops it with a little gremolata, sautéed spinach and mushrooms, pan-roasted squash and manchego. There's a little fun in there. I'm looking forward to seeing what she does next.

7 Arnold Quickfires
0
0
1
Last Week: 10 Eliminations
0
0
0

It might be a little unfair to put Arnold behind Andrea given that Gail fawned over his dish in her blog, but I feel like I just can't give a dessert as much weight this early. Not because it's any less difficult, but just because it's different, and the exception rather than the norm. That said, this looked like a nice cake, made with kaffir lime and basil, served with a bourbon ginger snap and topped with a coconut crème anglaise and a gelatinous concoction of cardamom, lemon juice and basil seeds. Oh, and the whole thing was paired with a lemongrass "Myint" julep (*groan*), so he already has a leg up on the inevitable booze challenge.

8 Tamesha Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: 14 Eliminations
0
0
0

Yeah, I know, this one doesn't make any damn sense. But she made the second-to-last round of the prep race, she was in the group of death, and Timothy, who's at number 9 for reasons I'll get into at the moment (and which also probably don't make any damn sense), lost out to her in his group, so I feel compelled to put her higher. Her recipe doesn't look all that exciting, but let's remember that this was part of the "any one of the dishes in that group could have won the whole challenge" group. Essentially, she made a jerked chicken meatball with polenta, a tamarind sauce and a tropical fruit slaw. But it apparently earned Tom's admiration, so here she is.

9 Timothy Quickfires
0
1
0
Last Week: 8 Eliminations
0
0
1

Yes, I know, somebody who was on the chopping block and who took criticism for both of his dishes is at the midpoint of the field. Did I mention that this doesn't make any damn sense? I'm basically punting on Timothy because he has both good and bad notes for this episode. On the good side, he made the final round of the quickfire, and he's in the group (I'm pretty sure) Tom identified as providing four dishes all of which could have potentially won the whole challenge. On the bad side, his garlic roasted chicken with potato galette, fennel, cherries, ras el hanout and oyster mushrooms had too much cream, and those comments at JT sure didn't SOUND like those that would be applied to a dish that "could have won the whole challenge." But here's my line of thinking. Tom says outright that all four of the QF finalists cooked "adeptly," and Gail stated in her blog that Tim's elimination dish "could have been a winner if only he had paid attention to a few crucial details." So my hunch is that Timothy got a bit of a misleading edit, and that the bottom of his group is still worthy of the middle of the pack. Exactly. 'Sides which, most of the people below him are there not because they showed poorly, but because they didn't show at all. Seems odd to move them up for the grand achievement of appearing on the show. I say we need another week to figure out what's up with Timothy.

10 Ed Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: 1 Eliminations
0
0
0

Ed's at the top of the bottom half, basically because I'm not going to bust the preseason number one down any further for two seconds of vague discontent from Tom and a partygoer saying that the cod didn't work for him. Ed made what basically looks like a more refined version of a Baltimore coddie, served with baked beans, shaved fennel and a mustard aioli. Tom's complaint was that there wasn't enough cod, but all the coddies I had in Baltimore were mostly potato, and they worked just fine for me. So I'm going to put the best possible interpretation on this and guess that Ed was shooting for a sort of traditional form that just didn't sit well with Tom. And he just didn't seem all THAT annoyed to begin with, so we'll stick with number ten for now.

11 Amanda Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: 16 Eliminations
0
0
0

Amanda, somehow I doubt Tom Colicchio and Eric Ripert were impressed by the California culinary history lesson. But that said, it was at least an interesting-looking recipe that garnered minor criticism. She dusted clementines with sencha, made a daikon-caraway gelée, pickled some cucumbers and put all three on top of raw snapper. So, uh... yeah, we'll see what she does next week.

12 Lynne Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: 15 Eliminations
0
0
0

Lynne is one of two contestants about whom we essentially learned nothing. Zero feedback on her dish. We know it was better than Stephen's and worse than Kenny's. Which also doesn't help. Recipe looks neat, though. Another dessert, she made waffles with corn-camembert ice cream, bacon praline, bourbon apple butter, maple-cardamom syrup, caramel syrup and acorn squash jam. And hey, she made the second-to-last tier of the prep race. So I suppose I should probably put her higher than two or three of the folks above who received negative comments. But I can't bring myself to move her based on nothing but her recipe. She'll have to just hang out in the nebulous portion of the bottom half this week.

13 Tiffany Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: 12 Eliminations
0
0
0

Ditto Tiffany, who is in the exact same boat as Lynne, better than John, not as good as Angelo, zero feedback. Not much to go on. Her not much, however, was a cajun shrimp and crawfish salad with ravigote sauce (that'd be of the mayonnaise-based New Orleans style variety rather than the traditional French variety), fried tomatillos and a bacon vinaigrette. She flew completely under the radar and her recipe didn't look quite as interesting to me as Lynne's, so she's essentially 12a.

14 Tracey Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: 9 Eliminations
0
0
0

I don't really have anything more to go on with Tracey than I do with the others, but there's one thing that bothers me. Tom seemed significantly underwhelmed with her dish for the three-quarters of a second we saw him talking about it. Problem is, the grits with maple cheddar and rock shrimp looks like it's Tracey's de facto signature dish. I found multiple writeups that all called it out as a favorite. So if Tom just grimaced at what may have been her best shot, she's toast.

15 Stephen Quickfires
0
0
1
Last Week: 2 Eliminations
0
0
1

Stephen had a rough couple of days. First round washout in the QF. Chopping block in the elimination. Scathing words from Tom and a chicken nugget comparison from Ripert. Plus, the guy's already sporting an episode nine strung-out look, and we're only two days in. It occurs to me that Stephen just left 14-month-old twins at home. I'm trying to decide whether this means he's already done and will be a quivering mass of goo by episode three, or if he'll follow the opposite trajectory of the typical Top Chef contestant and actually get more rested as the season wears on. Either way, he's not looking so hot right now. UPDATE: I neglected to mention that I'm betting Stephen will bounce back. I don't imagine you become a Tourondel hit man without some serious skill. But you can't lead off the season like that and not be near the bottom of the pile.

16 Jacqueline Quickfires
0
0
1
Last Week: 17 Eliminations
0
0
1

He's looking better than Jacqueline, though! Damn... so close to nailing the first exit three seasons in a row. Jacqueline sure didn't make a good showing for herself. Though I call shenanigans on the recipe. A quarter pound of butter for a pound of liver is not "almost no fat." The recipe she couldn't remember on the show? I suspect that's the one I'm looking at. What's more, the recipe says it's a duo of mousses, and Tom says in the extended judges' table video that she screwed up both of them, but I don't see two in the recipe. In that same video, Ripert talks about how he considered Jacqueline and John for elimination and settled on John. Good enough for me, even if I didn't already think so myself. Jacqueline now inhabits the basement.

17 John Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: 17 Eliminations
0
0
1

Cripes, John, at least Eve had the courtesy to stick around for an episode before washing out. And she didn't describe elements of her dishes as "just an instrument to bring the mousse to your mouth." And she didn't use three prepared items in her very first dish (the puff pastry, canned mango in syrup and a third item not identified but referenced in the extended JT video). Basically, it's clear that John screwed everything up. Everything. Even the stuff that was premade. Can the dude actually cook some good food? Who knows. He put bad mousse and bad sauce on frozen puff pastry. And I agree with some of the comments that there's nothing inherently wrong with frozen puff pastry. But your very first dish, when it comprises such a substantial portion of what's on your plate? Bad, bad call. We know he had some oven issues, but it's still amazing -- particularly looking at the recipes -- when you compare what John did with his time as compared to what some of the other chefs did with theirs. The goal was to introduce yourself and where you come from. John said he doesn't do pastry, and the judges couldn't taste the maple in the dish. With Jacqueline, at least they could look at her dish and see a (mostly) good idea, poorly executed. John gave them absolutely nothing to put forth as a point in his favor. He seems like a swell (if odd) fellow, but eliminations don't get much more deserving than this.

So there it is. Consider these the knee-jerk reactions they are until we get a little more data.

WARNING : MINOR EPISODE TWO SPOILERS AHEAD

Sadly, it doesn't look like that data is coming this week. I'm already gearing up to hate episode two. The quickfire is a really lame variant on cooking with one arm tied behind your back (also lame), and the elimination is a grammar school cafeteria challenge. So it looks like we might not learn much about the contestants other than which are going to be ultracompetitive bastards and which of them hate kids. But Kelly runs a food program for schoolchildren, so consider her the favorite.

Discuss!

June 18, 2010

Crudo

Albacore with Apples, Truffle and Black Garlic Dominic Armato

I have mused before, and I'll try not to make it a tired theme, about what strikes this particular newcomer as Phoenix's odd relationship with seafood. "It's tough to get fresh fish in the desert," I've heard, on more than one occasion. But surely, no sushi bar exists this side of the Pacific that obtains even half of its fish locally. Le Bernardin isn't exactly pulling its kanpachi, sea urchin, langoustine and hiramasa out of the Hudson. Heck, even when it comes to crab in Maryland, a state so devoted to the crustacean that the little blue buggers are on their driver's licenses, it's a challenge to find the locally fished variety. Most of Maryland's pride is shipped in from the Gulf of Mexico, Venezuela or Southeast Asia these days (perhaps less so the Gulf now, but... ugh... best not to think about that). Of course, there's nothing like day boat seafood, but the point is that whether or not they should be (a question I'll leave for the more ecologically-minded), seafood restaurants are largely location irrelevant. And yet, it's almost as though there's a lack of seafood culture here. So as odd as I may find the complete absence of independent fishmongers, it's refreshing to know that there are places -- quirky, independent ones, even -- that are devoted to a variety of lovely, fresh fish. It is, after all, Crudo's namesake.

Butterfish with Crispy LardoDominic Armato

"Quirky" may be one of the most important thoughts to hold onto, here. Crudo is a truly odd little beast, serving breakfast in the morning and fairly straightforward panini and flatbreads in the afternoon, only to morph into a creative, Italian-inspired seafood restaurant by night. This daily transmogrification is a function, it would seem, of the restaurant's location in the front of a hair salon. This isn't quite as odd as it sounds, but it's pretty close. The Steven Paul Salon once housed a more conventional cafe before Crudo took it over, and the room isn't shared with styling chairs and hairdryers, but rather a small jewelry and clothing boutique. And though I'm firmly in the food before ambiance camp, the better place to park, I think, is out on the patio, which is where we found ourselves on an unseasonably cool June evening.

Tuna with Orange, Basil and OlivesDominic Armato

Chefs Cullen Campbell and Brandon Crouser have tag-teamed a menu that's about fifteen items long, split right down the middle between hot and cold. But the more compelling option, for me at least, is the ability to do three, four or five courses -- your pick -- at $10 apiece, making it possible to bring a companion with whom you don't mind trading plates and sample two-thirds of the menu on one pass. The top half is mostly comprised of the namesake crudi, thinly-sliced raw fish doused in olive oil and seasonings that challenge tradition but are firmly rooted, for the most part, in Mediterranean flavors. Further encouraging sharing is the fact that the crudi plates are of a fair size. Splitting a dish will still yield you 4-5 slices of fish. Seafood options are mostly absent from the bottom, cooked half of the menu, but the meats and vegetables found there are similarly Italian-inspired, again with plenty of creative twists to keep things lively.

Hiramasa with Espelette and BottargaDominic Armato

The first dish to come our way was a firm and light butterfish, topped with crispy fried lardo and oven-dried tomatoes. Consisting of nothing but cured pork fat, the lardo first crunches and then melts into the fish when you take a bite, and the oven-dried tomatoes provide a cleaner, sweeter flavor than a typical sun-dried, which always seems to completely take over any dish it's added to. Good call there. Meanwhile, my ladylove started on tuna, awash in olive oil and topped generously with orange segments, diced olives and basil. The olives -- again, a very clean-tasting variety -- gave a little salty punch without giving too much, and while the dish could have benefitted from a better piece of fish, I don't mean to cast aspersions on the quality of crudo's seafood, which was generally quite good and no less than I'd expect without getting into, no doubt, pricier territory.

Madai with Meyer Lemon and Sea BeansDominic Armato

The second wave was even a little stronger, my dish being hiramasa, a type of amberjack, done with iitois (a local allium with which I'm not yet familiar, but it could have passed for a chive), a dash of spicy espelette and a hint of grated bottarga. It's about this time that I noticed each of these crudi was introducing an element that was a little rough around the edges -- fried pork fat, briny olive, fishy bottarga -- which I rather enjoyed as a departure from the clean/tart/sweet profiles that typify most creative Asian sashimi these days. After trading dishes, I had another that followed the same pattern: generous squares of albacore with crisp green apple matchsticks, black garlic and a touch of earthy truffle. Clean, sweet and tart balanced by earthy and pungent. Another refreshing taste with a little character.

Anchovy with Roasted Baby BellsDominic Armato

Our final pass at the crudi contained what was, for me, the peak and valley of the top half of the menu. I started with the peak, the "Japanese auction" selection for the week, which was madai, a type of red snapper, dressed in a lightly sweet Meyer lemon oil, Meyer lemon rind and a scattering of sea beans, confusingly named as they aren't beans and don't grow in the sea, even if they rather taste like it. I found this to be the most delightful crudo of the evening, due in no small part to the fish which seemed a notch above the rest of the pack, even before I realized that was our "special." And though I enjoyed some more than others, the only crudo I'd be perfectly content to scratch off my list was the white anchovy with roasted bell peppers, housemade pickles and shiso. But that may be attributable to the fact that I find it hard to get excited about marinated white anchovies, which always strike me as way too heavy on the vinegar, and these were no exception.

Fegato Grasso with Polenta and DatesDominic Armato

Having shaded more heavily towards the crudi in our selections, we were forced to pass on some rather delightful-looking hot dishes, like a rolled veal breast, gnocchi with prosciutto broth and fingerling potatoes with more lardo. But I suppose you need something to go back for. I found the latter half of the menu a little more uneven, actually, including one dish that didn't quite sit well with me at all. The fegato grasso (exactly what you think it is) was served surrounded by a loose polenta and topped with honey and dates. The combination of honey and dates I found just a little too powerful for the fegato, which was lost unless I got a big chunk of it and a touch of the accompaniments, quickly leaving me with a big plate of polenta, dates and honey. But more importantly, something in the polenta clashed with the fegato... butter, I think? To my palate, they just fought each other. This dish didn't come together for me.

Mushrooms Au GratinDominic Armato

More successful was the menu's requisite umami bomb, which I'd chide as a culinary trend except for the fact that I kind of like it. "Au Gratin" is a terribly misleading way to label the mushrooms, which are, I believe, roasted with mozzarella, Grana Padano, fingerling potatoes, and a little truffle before being topped with a very loose egg. This one's not rocket science, and it may be a slave to fashion, but really, what's not to like? Slightly less trendy was a beet-stained risotto, and while "stained" might give the impression that this was a surface application, in reality it was a full-on BEET dish. A small tower of risotto was wrapped with grilled zucchini and capped with a thick slab of roasted beet and a lone basil leaf. The balsamic drizzled around struck me as unnecessary. It's easy sweetness and overused, particularly in a dish that featured enough natural sweetness to make it redundant. The risotto was done with bacon and Grana Padano, and the flavor was wonderful, even if the texture struck me as slightly off. The risotto had bite -- most important -- but it struck me as a little too loose. These are, however, minor complaints. This was a very nice dish.

Beet-Stained RisottoDominic Armato

The winner of the hot dishes for me was a brodetto alla Triestina, which bucked convention in a way that made me rather happy. Brodetto, in its origins, was a humble seafood stew, made with whatever was abundant, most often done with tomato and wine and tarted up with vinegar (I've always wanted to say that in a food context). This is usually a rustic dish, but here it's cleaned up for a night on the town. A very light interpretation, this brodetto comes across more like a pile of fish and vegetables sitting in a broth, which has its upsides and downsides. The downside is that the yellowtail, potatoes and oven-dried tomatoes, while bright, tender and delicious, somehow didn't feel fully infused with the broth's character. But then again, maybe that would have been too much. The broth carries a punch, sweet and tart and so powerful that it almost feels like an agrodolce, and yet is light and clean and doesn't leave you feeling sticky sweet. I'm a little torn. I'm not convinced the body of the "stew" couldn't be better married to the broth, but I dig that broth so much I'm pretty content with it the way it is.

Yellowtail BrodettoDominic Armato

We weren't feeling dessert that evening, though the choices sounded mostly conventional. Of course, that can fool you sometimes (I love that no matter how many people rip it off and give it flashy names, Jean-Georges still refers to it simply as "warm chocolate cake"). But we left quite satisfied. Crudo is a charming, if unconventional, little place. In general, I think the crudi are stronger than the piatti, but it's mostly a very solid menu, and I wouldn't hesitate to return. Another thing I'm trying to adjust to here is the summer lull. It's one thing to hear about how restaurants get rather quiet this time of year, and it's another thing to go to a place the Saturday after a glowing writeup from the New Times, sit for three hours and only see two other tables. But looking around the neighborhood, the quiet certainly didn't seem limited to Crudo. Frustrating as that might be, I suppose it's better that it's the season rather than the digs. But if the summer kills off as many restaurants as I've heard, Crudo deserves to be on the list of places to help through the heat. And with cool, light, raw fish dishes as their specialty, doing so certainly won't be a chore.

Crudo
www.crudoaz.com
7045 East 3rd Avenue
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
480-603-1011
Tue8:00 AM - 8:00 PM
Wed - Sat8:00 AM - 10:00 PM

June 16, 2010

Top Chef - S7E1 Postmortem

Go ahead, TGP... I deserve it.

Eeeeysh. That was more embarrassing than Eve. And for even more painful reasons. (Just a vehicle to get it to your mouth? John, I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt and you're killing me here.) You win... that's the last time I let accolades keep me from putting somebody where I suspect they ought to be.

Couple of surprises, for me, anyway. Kenny apparently hasn't lost a step since shifting from EC to empire management. Stephen's the other big mover, but I'm betting he bounces back. I'm hoping he bounces back. I don't think I can take two early flameouts in the top half, especially if one of them is number two. And Alex shoots out of the middle of the pack, at least for now.

Enough about my broken pride, though... great start to the season! Good challenges, interesting food and the judges are in fine form. It is, of course, still early. I'm sure some who looked shaky will get it together, and some others may have just used their best ammunition and have nowhere to go but down.

A quick note, for those who are wondering, anything that's been broadcast is fair game the moment it hits the sets on the East Coast. And with that, I'll leave the rest for the rankings. On Monday. There's... um... going to be some movement.

*sigh*

Late Night Behind the Orange Curtain

Ice Beer and Vietnamese Karaoke Elvis @ Nhu Y Ca 8 Mon Dominic Armato

Spending a weekend in Orange County is not what one would commonly refer to as a cultural experience. Particularly when the goal of such a visit is to take a three-year-old on his inaugural trip to Disney. Lest I lend the wrong impression, I'm a fan of Disney. Always have been. If you accept that you're cattle, hand in your wallet and check your cynicism at the front gate, you can have a pretty great time. Even if your kid mostly seems interested in spending time in your hotel room. But let's not delude ourselves, here. While debatably the happiest place on earth, Disneyland is not a food-friendly environment. So when the house of the mouse has shut down for the evening and the rest of the family is fast asleep, it's time to find some Vietnamese.

Duck Soup with NoodlesDominic Armato

Orange County, for those unawares, is one of the nation's hotbeds for Vietnamese restaurants. I'm unfamiliar with the specific demographics of the area, but let's just say there are an awful lot of people of Vietnamese descent living there, and they like to eat an awful lot of Vietnamese food. Thankfully, many of them like to eat it very late at night, which is when I had the opportunity to sneak away. Both times, the late hour did much to dictate my options, and I ended up at one of the few joints still open at 2:30 in the morning, the southern location of Luc Dinh Ky (only two blocks away from the northern location), where the Friday night party crowd was well into the post-booze munchy phase of the evening. It's small, sparse, bright and lively bordering on raucous at that hour on a weekend, and I parked and gave the menu a quick glance for whatever sounded right that evening.

CatfishDominic Armato

What grabbed me was a duck soup with noodles, bún vịt xáo măng, I believe, to those whose grasp of menu Vietnamese is less tenuous than mine (I really need to work on that). And though I briefly questioned whether I should have gone with something I was less likely to find back home, when it arrived and I took a few sips, all I could think was that I wish home had 2:30 AM options like this. It was a beautiful, clean bowl of broth, crystal clear and full of duck flavor... not to mention a sizeable portion of the beast itself, noodles and some greens. Frankly, I was pleased that the stock didn't taste of chicken, and the fact that my bar has been reset so low is nothing short of a tragedy. Is there anything more comforting than this? A simple stock with a little meat and noodles? The thought of this would get me through day two of amusement park food.

The next night, I snuck out again, this time with a food nerd friend from the Chicago days, Tony, who knows a thing or two about the local scene. He'd heard good things about another late-night joint not far from where I was staying, so we converged on Nhu Y Ca 8 Mon for what turned out to be as much a cultural experience as a meal.

Birthday CakeDominic Armato

I define "cultural" a little broadly, here, but the point is that this was the full package, not just the food. Upon entering, we were asked whether we'd like to be seated with or without music. "Music," we responded. Hey, why not? This landed us in a ballroom with a huge dance floor, colored lights of every kind, crumpled aluminum foil covering the ceiling, a crowd of thirty drunken birthday revelers, and Vietnamese Elvis, in full regalia, on stage performing karaoke. Tony boldly predicted that we'd be eating birthday cake before the night was out. We started out by putting down a little beer, poured into a frosty sub-zero mug that made it all too easy to drink. I let Tony take the lead and he had a hankering for catfish, so that's what we had, and it was a fine specimen, right down to the maraschino cherries. The fish really was nice, moist and tender with a very crisp -- almost crunchy -- lacquered shell that added both texture and depth of flavor to the rolls. It's Vietnamese. You know the drill. Wet a rice wrapper in a bowl of scalding hot water, add some noodles, fresh herbs, pickled vegetables along with your fish before rolling up. And we even received a trio of sauces for dipping... a standard nuoc cham, a spicier variant, and a concoction derived from fermented fish that dominated my attention. It didn't plumb the funky depths of the fermentation barrel, so to speak (not that I wouldn't have welcomed that), but rather it was a very sweet, tart and light version that I could've eaten with a spoon.

Two late nights in this area is really just a tease, but I'll take what I can get. Tony and I shut the place down, catching up and talking about all things food and non as Vietnamese Elvis disappeared and the drunken revelers stumbled out one by one. The fellow running the joint even gave us a couple pieces of leftover birthday cake with our check. Score one for Tony.

Luc Dinh Ky Restaurant Tap 2
9600 Bolsa Avenue
Westminster, CA 92683
714-775-8811
Sun - Wed10:00 AM - 2:00 AM
Fri - Sat10:00 AM - 3:00 AM
Nhu Y Ca 8 Mon
www.nhuyrestaurant.com
10830 Warner Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
714-963-1700
Mon - Thu12:00 PM - 1:00 AM
Fri - Sun10:30 AM - 1:00 AM

June 15, 2010

Rayner vs. Moonen

I usually try to avoid wading into discussion of the judging travesty du jour. There's so much we don't see, so much we don't know (including, most importantly, how everything tasted) that any discussion thereof is highly speculative. Which is fine and good. It's when speculative discussion takes on a strident and/or absolutist tone that I try to steer clear. But this particular controversy only seems to be heating up, so what the hell, let's open the floor.

For those who might have missed it, the aftermath of the Top Chef Masters finale has been a little bloody. And not just in the typical "some fans are pissed" manner. It actually started at critics table, where Rayner questioned Moonen's use of New Zealand venison given his opinions regarding sustainability. The discussion... escalated... before ending up on the editing room floor. We know about it because Rayner told us about it on his Bravo TV blog, embarrassed that he'd lost his cool, but unashamed of the fact that he docked Moonen half a point for not following his own philosophy in a final challenge that was supposed to do exactly that. It didn't quite end there. An eater.com writer stirred the pot a bit, and now Rayner and Moonen are going directly at each other (though Rayner, at last check, insists he's done).

A popular take on the situation seems to be that Moonen was robbed and that Rayner destroyed the integrity of the judging process, but I think two questions are being conflated, here:

1) Did Rayner make the right judgment call?
2) Was it appropriate for him TO make that judgment call?

The first is a tough one. Is New Zealand venison sustainable? Was using it in conflict with Moonen's stated philosophy? Did he even know at the time? Does it matter in the context of Top Chef Masters? Did it matter enough to merit a half a star deduction? They're all good questions that have launched good discussions... none of which I intend to tackle here and now (though you're more than welcome to do so... keep it constructive, please!)

The second is the one that's frustrating me. It's being suggested that Rayner was out of line, that it was inappropriate for him to dock Moonen, that talking about it on his blog constitutes an "admission," and that the final result is illegitimate.

While I understand the frustration of those who feel this cost Moonen a victory (though I think there's a certain amount of speculation involved even in that claim), I find this maddening. Over eight seasons of Top Chef and Top Chef Masters, thematic challenges have been a mainstay. Of course, it's generally acknowledged that food comes before theme. As long as you keep a tenuous hold on the theme, cook great food and you're probably going to do fine. But if you drift too far from the theme, it's understood that you might get dinged for it. And contestants have been dinged for it. In fact, unscientific personal observation leads me to believe that people are more often frustrated when the judges are too lenient about a theme rather than too strict. But the point is that it's been firmly established that it's perfectly within the scope of their duties to take adherence to the challenge's theme into account when judging.

So let's look at this finale. It was not, as some seem to be unaware or are conveniently ignoring in the rush to savage Rayner, to simply cook the tastiest meal. Like any other thematic challenge on Top Chef, it was to cook the tastiest meal within a certain context, and that context was for the chefs to express themselves, their careers, their styles, their lives on the plate (I'm paraphrasing, here). Sustainability is a very, very big part of Rick Moonen's work as a chef. And that's Rick Moonen talking, not me. What we don't know is how frequently or how strongly Moonen touted that philosophy in six episodes leading up to the finale (he wasn't in three of the preliminary rounds). But let's say, for the sake of argument, that he made it a central theme of his experience as a chef.

Now take this hypothetical. Let's say one of those finalists was a vegan. And let's say that this chef had spent those six episodes cooking vegan meals and taking time at critics table to talk about how he felt it was wrong to exploit animals, and that cooking vegan food was incredibly important to him. And let's say that after being told the final challenge was to cook a meal that expressed who he was as a chef, made one of his courses a big honking T-bone. And let's say that after being asked about that choice, he said, "Hey, it's a cooking competition." How could one not conclude that he had simply flaunted the theme of the challenge?

I put this forth not to suggest that Moonen's transgression (if, indeed, there was one at all) was as serious, but simply to illustrate that there is a point at which a chef is brazenly flaunting the theme of the challenge and should probably be called on it and/or scored accordingly. You may not like that as a final challenge. You may want it to be a straight-up cook the tastiest meal possible challenge without any theme at all. But that's not what it was. Rayner didn't judge the challenge all of us would have liked him to judge. He judged the challenge the chefs were given.

Jay Rayner may or may not have made the right call. But he did the right thing in making it.

June 14, 2010

Top Chef - S7E0 Power Rankings

Holy crap! Top Chef is almost here!

I'd like to take a moment to applaud Padma for her decision to breed. Sounds like it bought us a little extra time between seasons six and seven and boy howdy, did I need it. This stuff is exhausting, you guys. But as much as I'm usually ready to hang myself by episode ten (wait and see when I use my get out of the Power Rankings free card for the season... that's usually when it's become a slog), it's always exciting to start a new season. Perhaps doubly so this season, because of the little surprise judging shakeup that occurred a month or two back.

For those who might not have heard, everybody's favorite snarky Englishman, Toby Young, is on the outs, having been replaced by everybody's favorite fishy Frenchman, Eric Ripert. And while I'd still kick Ripert to the curb in favor of Jay Rayner in a heartbeat, this is a pretty freaking good catch (ha!) for the Magical Elves. Ripert's been around a lot as a guest judge. He knows the drill. He handles the spotlight quite well (even if the Santa suit incident was... unfortunate). There's no questioning his bona fides when it comes to culinary knowledge, and though some folks have expressed fear that he will crush and destroy anybody whose seafood is anything less than absolutely perfect, I think he's shown an ability to be very understanding and constructive in his previous judging stints. This is a regime change I feel great about.

I feel a lot less great about the preseason rankings this time around. First of all, last season's were too freakishly good. I have no idea how that happened. So let's be clear right off that bat, that will not happen again. Then, there's the field this season. I feel like I'm researching Supreme Court nominees. As if they've been picked specifically because they aren't leaving a nice paper trail. Last season, there were a few like that, but this season is packed with chefs who may have traceable resumes, but whose current work is shrouded in mystery. And among those to whom I could pin a menu? Seasonal Contemporary American. All of them. Well, not ALL of them. There is kind of a lot of French. But cripes, it seems like they're all cooking the same damn food this season. And what's more, I feel like the field is a little more compressed top to bottom. The throwaways are harder to throw away and have just enough mystery to make you wonder if there's a total sleeper in there somewhere. And the top tier have question marks... ones that will be resolved very quickly, I'm sure, but question marks nonetheless. The talent level is high again. It's no season six, and I don't think we're going to see anything like the four horsemen, but if last season hadn't completely blown the curve, I'd be super impressed by this crowd. And I still am. I just bothers me that in the top tier, last season was a matter of picking who I thought was most likely to kick ass and take names, and this season is a matter of trying to figure out who I think is least likely to be a surprise washout.

Confidence level, low, but here it goes anyway. As last year, the preseason rankings, in reverse order:

Wins
Top
Bottom
17 Jacqueline Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

Jacqueline (that's jack-LEEN, apparently) might have some skills, but she's chock full of warning signs, not the least of which is that she's a 9/11 career changer who was originally in advertising. Which explains why the website for her catering company, Jacqueline Lombard Events, is so slick. That she did a stint at Otto looks semi-interesting, until it's revealed that she was doing pastry. No less noble, but that's a bonus for Top Chef, not a baseline. Where it gets really problematic is when you try to figure out what kind of food she's cooking now. Her newest restaurant project, Leña, isn't off the ground. Her website has been oddly scrubbed of all menus and recipes, leaving no clue as to her style. In fact, the only information I could find about any of her food was a handful of reviews of Gansevoort 69, where she developed a comfort food menu that's garnered responses ranging from mediocre to awful. Yeah, everybody and their brother is doing comfort-ING food nowadays, but she really takes it to an extreme. Meatloaf with diced peas and carrots? Grilled chicken sandwich with guacamole? BLT? The menu reads like the clubhouse grill at a public golf course. And I've seen photos. They look about as good. One blogger tried her Spaghettios (yes, she served spaghettios) and said Chef Boyardee's Franco American's were better. Ouch. Far as I can tell, she has a really pretty website with a long list of big name clients. But it's tough to go on that alone. I'm putting her at the bottom of the pile until further notice.

16 Amanda Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

I'm very uncomfortable putting Amanda this low, not because I've seen anything to make me think she deserves anything higher, but because I just haven't seen anything. She's worked within Joachim Splichal's organization and was even executive sous of his ill-fated seafood joint, Paperfish, but I just have absolutely no idea what she can do. She trained at Le Cordon Bleu and has seemingly bounced all over the place, hitting a few Michelin-starred places in Europe as well as -- by her own description -- just about all of the fine dining restaurant in Los Angeles (a dubious claim, but okay). But what does she cook? No clue. Has she ever designed a menu or even her own dishes? Couldn't tell you. She isn't even attached to a restaurant at the moment, listing her occupation as "consultant." She's a total mystery contestant who could turn out to be some kind of mega sleeper. But I doubt it. So I'm putting her near the bottom.

15 Lynne Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

If this were 2001 instead of 2011, I might have Lynne a lot higher. And it's not because of her age (51). Unlike some, I don't buy the theory that anybody over a certain age is washed-up. She may prove to be, but I'm not jumping to that conclusion. No, the reason I bring up ancient history is because once upon a time, in a town called Atlanta, Lynne had a very warmly-regarded restaurant called Grappa, where she prepared her "hands off" cuisine, treating things simply and letting ingredients be. And I can see that appealing to Colicchio, in particular, if she does it really well. But Grappa is long, long gone, and it seems that she's spent her time since then as a professor at the CIA. Excuse me, assistant professor. Now, I hesitate to throw out fighting words that start with "Those who can't do," but it does kinda make you wonder. Maybe not. Maybe she's a fabulously skilled chef who was simply seeking a little stability. After helming a failed restaurant, post forty no less, I can see how regular hours and a steady paycheck might be mighty attractive. But even if so, she's been out of the fire for a while. Gotta consider her a bottom-tier contestant with upside potential.

14 Tamesha Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

There are a lot of reasons I can't put Tamesha very high. At 24, she's very young. She's never held an executive position that I can find, and while her bio lists her style as modern American with French and Asian influences, I've seen no concrete examples thereof. What she has going for her is that she's currently sous at The Oval Room, which is really rocking the DC food nerds I know right now. And what's more, she was brought there by Executive Chef Tony Conte, who left Jean-Georges' stable and took her with him. So she has to be a formidable technician, and she's working a hot kitchen. That has to be worth something. And bonus, home field advantage.

13 Kenny Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

Kenny's another contestant I have a very, very tenuous grip on. He runs a company called Passionate Culinary Enterprises, which "is focused on assisting food and beverage organizations to become synergistically sound." Okay, then. Basically, it looks like restaurant management and consulting. And in his intro video, he even talks about how he'd really like to go beyond the food and bring some leadership to Top Chef. The guy's already pegging himself as a manager rather than a creative. But he has real restaurant experience. He made a little buzz down in Florida about a decade ago, and his most recent project is all of the food for a Telluride resort called Capella, including their fine dining restaurant, Onyx. But damned if I can't find anything anybody has to say about Onyx, good or bad. Onyx doesn't even post a full menu, instead highlighting just two or three dishes. Kenny defines his style with a grocery list of ethnic cuisines including Japanese, Thai, Vietnamese, Italian, Middle Eastern, Indian, Native American, Moroccan and African. Sure you didn't miss any there, Kenny? But that's not exactly evident in his current work. But dig a little bit, and it turns out he's done a number of dinners at the James Beard house, and some of them look kind of interesting. So I'm going to put him near the top of the bottom tier. There might be some sleeper potential here. At the very least, he should be technically sound enough and experienced enough to survive for a while.

12 Tiffany Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

This is about where I feel there's a transition to the middle of the pack, and while it's tricky to find daylight between most of them this season, I feel like I have a pretty good grip on where most of them are coming from. Tiffany does seafood, and this means so could be Ripert's best friend, or his favorite punching bag. She's the executive chef of Go Fish Ocean Club in Dallas, and it has a menu of clean, crisply presented seafood with Asian and the occasional island accents. Oysters with green apple mignonette; fried green tomatoes with shrimp ravigote, radish pico and remoulade; olive oil poached escolar with fiddlehead ferns, morels, corn and garlic confit; jerk fish... you get the idea. Tiffany has been heading up the kitchen there since 2008, so she's had some time to get her sea legs (ha!), and a recent writeup from the Dallas Morning News was rather complimentary. Plus, the food goes a fairly refined route, which would help in the later stages should she stick around. Plus, I like the fact that her alma mater, the Art Institute of Houston, apparently thought enough of her to let her do some amount of instruction so young. Yeah, I know, could've been the culinary equivalent of a TA for all we know, but it implies she was a good student. Of course, she's young, there isn't a ton out there about Go Fish and she's bound to fall into Ripert's crosshairs at some point, so there are some significant marks against her, but I think she might show us something that merits sticking around for a bit.

11 Alex Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

I'm not sure why, but I'm getting kind of a dark horse vibe from Alex. And I say dark horse because his menu is out there, it's clearly his, and yet I'm having a heck of a time finding much in the way of commentary upon it. He trained at Le Cordon Bleu in Vegas, and worked at Lutece and a number of restaurants in the Bally's empire before catching the eye of Ivan Kane and moving to Los Angeles to launch Ivan Kane's Cafe Was. Cafe Was looks more like a theme park than a restaurant, but what little I can find seems to be positive, and his menu looks interesting, at least. He terms it "California Bistro," which looks to me like mostly straightforward French bistro with some creative touches. The problem is that so little has been written about the place that I'm really not sure what to think. Is it untouched by the MSM because it's young, or because it looks like a theme restaurant? Hard to say. So I just can't put him any higher. But there might be a little surprise potential here.

10 Arnold Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

Arnold makes me nervous. First because he's a big personality, and you always have to wonder if the big personalities get a bit of a pass on skill. Second, because he's a career changer who started as a figure skater (you can't make this stuff up). And third, because of his cooking style. But we'll get to that. In his favor, he comes from a restaurant family, he did some training in NYC including some involvement in the Jean-Georges empire that I couldn't nail down, and he currently owns and is the EC for three successful Nashville area restaurants. Launching three winners (even if two of them are fairly young) is impressive for a 32-year-old, no matter where you live. What gives me pause is that his three restaurants -- PM, Cha Chah and Suzy Wong's House of Yum (you read that right) -- absolutely scream scene over cuisine. And some menu items are pushing into Tex Wasabi territory. Deluxe Asian wonton nachos with BBQ pork, queso blanco, edamame, cilantro pico, sriracha and red curry crema... wait, what? Seriously, it reads like your worst Asian fusion nightmare. The menu at Cha Chah, a tapas joint, is a little less frightening, but it also lends the impression that he's dabbling in cuisines rather than learning them. But all of the local press I could find is quite positive and, again, the guy's launched three winners, so I'm trying to respect those facts even if my instincts say no, no, please, no.

9 Tracey Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

I have Tracey in the upper end of the MOTP (middle of the pack) because she's been around a while, seems well-regarded back home, is coming out of the CIA and might have a little extra versatility. Actually, she's been around quite a bit, bouncing around Georgia and Florida for a number of years. Then she was sous at Luna Park in the Orlando area before landing at her current home, Table 1280 in Atlanta, where she was elevated to EC in early 2008. She does contemporary American with some Southern touches, sending out dishes like royal rock shrimp with Logan Turnpike grits and maple cheddar; black bass with shaved cauliflower, sweet celery, white truffle oil and salsa verde; or a Niman Ranch pork chop with toasted farro, asparagus and pickled ramps. A lot of her pairings are fairly conventional by today's standards, but by all local accounts I could find they're cleanly plated, properly prepared and quite tasty. She hasn't gotten enough notice to make me think she's anything more than a middle-of-the-packer, but she seems capable. Also in her favor is the fact that she does a lot of themed menus to coordinate with the productions and art exhibitions at the Woodruff Arts Center, which houses the restaurant. When the terra cotta soldiers roll into town, maybe Chinese isn't her specialty, but that kind of flexibility could help her survive when she's forced out of her element. And she does pastry, which is the Top Chef equivalent of a mini derringer in a calf holster.

8 Timothy Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

Though Timothy is somehow supposed to be an almost star who has trained with some big names, I'm troubled less by what I've heard about him and more by what I haven't heard about him. He came up under Jean-Louis Palladin in DC, who thought enough of him to make him Chef de Cuisine of Palladin in NYC. And his bio notes that he's worked alongside Alain Ducasse (indeed, it looks like he spent some time at Louis XV in Monaco), Roberto Donna, Guenter Seeger and Patrick Clark (even if the careful wording of "worked alongside" gives me pause... heck, I worked alongside Charlie Trotter.) But here's the thing. Timothy has spent the past six or seven years in Baltimore, and I lived -- quite literally -- four or five blocks from his place for two years. And I basically heard nothing. He opened his first restaurant, Timothy Dean Bistro, in 2004. When the Bistro started tanking, he converted it into TD Lounge, which is what it was for most of my stay in Baltimore. And now, he's just launched Prime Steakhouse (which, BTW, uses choice meat), and the lead critic for the Baltimore Sun seems to feel it's a just shy of great kind of restaurant. So why, when I ping the Baltimore food nerds for a little info, do I get a collective shrug in return? Admittedly, Timothy has had a lot of distractions. He's been involved in a couple of very high-profile lawsuits, and it sounds like he lost his wife to breast cancer a few years ago. Maybe a little Top Chef-style isolation, where he has nothing to do but concentrate on the food for a few weeks, is exactly what he needs to show this great culinary promise he's supposed to have. But I'm dubious.

7 John Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

Here, I see another bit of a break as we move into contestants who have some strong credentials, but aren't cracking the top tier because there are just some question marks. I realize I just put a guy who was a James Beard nominee in 2008 and 2009 down at number seven. And no, it's not an indication of an incredible top six. It's just... it's just... I dunno. Something about John's whole situation gives me pause. He's an engineer who fell into a restaurant called The Lark, outside of Detroit. And he's been there for sixteen years, working his way from garde manger up to Chef de Cuisine, a position he's held since 2006. So the guy has spent his entire culinary career in one restaurant. And that one restaurant is a bit of an odd duck. The Lark is an old warhorse with an old world decor managed by old world Europeans who guided its mostly old world European menu. You choose a main course, and with that main course comes a nondescript salad and a selection from the "hors d'oeuvre trolley." If you order their signature Rack of Lamb Gehghis Khan, you get a little printed card showing how many they've now served. And yet, it's now overseen -- and has been for four or five years -- by a guy who supposedly is into all kinds of eclectic, international flavors? The menu's oddly schizophrenic. Roast prime rib with Yorkshire pudding, Tournedos Rossini, Lobster Thermidor, prime beef strip loin with Burgundy reduction on one hand. Then there's macadamia nut crusted barramundi with tropical fruit relish and ginger beurre blanc, morel and artichoke Napoleon with pine nuts and tempura vegetables, grilled loin of rabbit with garlic flan... I mean, nothing's that far out there but it almost seems like there's a culture clash going on, and I just don't know what to make of it. And yet, a lot of people love the place. It's been around forever, charging $70-90 a head for this prix fixe menu. But reading around, I just kind of get the impression that it's coasting on reputation. I haven't read anything good from any source I trust, and there's a little too much, "Yeah... it's really not all that," going on. I don't know. Sometimes those early James Beard nominations are peppered with big fish in small ponds, and I wonder if this is one of those situations. I may regret starting John off so low, but there it is.

6 Andrea Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

Andrea strikes me as a "you know what you're going to get" contestant, and I feel like I can already see her trajectory: Solid at the start, maybe a little vanilla but steady, slowly outpaced as it gets into the second half of the season. She's a CIA grad who's run a restaurant called Talula along with her husband down in Miami for about ten years, and it's gotten a lot of great press. At first, I thought she might be a heavy hitter, but then I started looking a little more closely. She was one of Food & Wine's best new chefs... in 2000. The NY Times listed Talula in a section of "places to be now"... in 2003. Their website is chock full of nice press clippings... from 2004 and 2005. I started to get the impression that maybe time had just passed Andrea by, and then I fell upon a piece in the local alternative paper that basically said exactly that (the sharp retort from Andrea's husband in the comments section of that post was... interesting). But some food nerds seem to love the place, and claim that Talula is still one of the best joints in the area, it's just that Miami Beach tourists have been seduced by glitzier options that have opened in the interim. Adding another layer of interest is that Andrea and her husband are just now opening a place called The Water Club with a really basic-looking sandwichy salady kind of menu that would seem totally nondescript except for the fact that it seats 500 people. Based purely on her husband's response to that post in the Miami New Times, it's clear she and her husband have something to prove. Either they cook the right way and they've been outpaced by more glamorous options, or they're still cooking like they did a decade ago and the rest of the world has moved on. Guess we'll find out which.

5 Kevin Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

He's from Jersey, he's a big, beefy guy, and he runs a place called Rat's Restaurant. This does NOT tell you all you need to know about Kevin. It's rather misleading, in fact. Kevin, as far as I can tell, is not season seven's Joey/Howie/Danny. First off, Rat's Restaurant is actually a reference to The Wind in the Willows, and it's located at the Grounds for Sculpture in Hamilton. And second, in his intro interview at least, Kevin strikes me as rather soft-spoken. So he's not what he seems from a quick glance at the bio. So what is he? Well, he's been running Rat's since Stephen Starr took it over last summer, where he's been putting out a French-Mediterranean menu with some creative touches... toasted peanuts with the duck pate, sea beans with the butter-braised lobster tail, smoked chickpeas with the steamed halibut, etc. There are some less unique options too, like the spinach ravioli with parmesan froth, sweet pea puree, porcini mushrooms and lemon oil. Of course, the menu actually reads "raviolis," so maybe you can't take the Jersey out of the kid after all. But the thing I keep coming back to is that it sounds like he made a pretty good showing at the 2008 USA trials for the Bocuse d'Or. Now, we can debate the merits of the competition, and the award he won was for presentation (meat, natch), but it takes an incredible amount of dedication to jump into that fray, and the fact that he was even on that stage says something. And with two or three years as Chef de Cuisine at the Ritz in Philadelphia and a stint as culinary director of Jose Garces' restaurant group, it isn't as though his resume is light. Thing is, he's originally from Hamilton, and now he's working in Hamilton. My hunch is that he could've move onto to bigger and better things, but decided he'd like to be home for a little while. I'm getting a good vibe here. Rat's is kind of under the radar, but I think Kevin might have some surprises in him.

4 Angelo Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

I have Angelo as a near miss for the top tier. What I like about him is that he's a CIA grad who spent a lot of time in prominent positions for Jean-Georges restaurants, including stints as executive sous at Spice Market and even Jean Georges. What I don't like about him is that the first restaurant he opened as EC, Yumcha, tanked in under a year, and he's now running a sandwich show. Which sounds worse than it is. Sosa is all about creative Asian, and Yumcha, somewhat in the spirit of Jean-Georges' own failed 66, was a very open, modern take on Chinese cuisine. Chinese-inspired might even be a more appropriate way of putting it. And from what I can tell, people really liked it! Important people who know their food, even! So I can't figure out why the place didn't make it, and it's tough digging up info on places that have been closed for five years. Perhaps some NY food nerd can fill us in, here. So now, he runs Xie Xie, which is an Asian sandwich shop with five sandwiches. Not banh mi, mind you, but Asian sandwiches. Really interesting, creative ones, actually, that people -- important people who know their food, even -- seem to rather like. So I get the feeling that the guy was stung by Yumcha's failure and is kind of regrouping. I'd feel better if it weren't taking so long, but it seems like there's a lot to like here. Heck, the guy was even invited by Alain Ducasse to do a guest menu at Spoon in Paris (though I didn’t particularly like Spoon). It’s just... five sandwiches, huh?

3 Kelly Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

Here we enter the top tier, even if I kick it off with one that could (and probably will) come back to bite me in the ass. I just can't help but rank Kelly awfully high. In some ways, she has Eve written all over her. Her restaurant, Kelly Liken (oy), is in a very small, insular community, she's been running the place since 2004, and everybody seems to love it. But she hasn't traveled, hasn't worked in any big kitchens I can find, and has seemed pretty content to do her thing out there in Vail, Colorado. Which is great, if she's good. And she might be as good as the limited press suggests. She's a CIA grad, she's pulled down a James Beard nomination, Bon Appétit was all over her at one point... she's been making some noise out there. Heck, she even has camera experience. She recently challenged on Iron Chef America, and lost to Jose Garces. Sadly, I missed it, and it wasn't exceptionally close. Garces beat her by five points, including a large-ish gap in the all-important "taste" category (the ingredient was bleu cheese). But again, the fact that she was asked on the show says something, and I'm sure she took a lot away from that experience that's going to come in handy on Top Chef. And I like the cut of her jib. She cooks a fun-looking contemporary American menu with a lot of local influence, including dishes like Dungeness crab salad with tomato-watermelon gazpacho, chili oil and pickled watermelon rind; pan roasted duck breast with wild rice hoe cake, sautéed arugula, blackberry conserve and cassis gastrique; and Colorado rack of lamb with eggplant caviar, feta studded farro, pickled red-onion fennel salad and creamy cucumber raita. The only red flag -- and it isn't a small one -- is that her latest venture, a casual joint called Rick & Kelly's American Bistro, is getting savaged. But if it turns out that she's simply a one-restaurant chef who can't maintain a satellite, is that necessarily a bad thing?

2 Stephen Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

I have never been less confident about my top two picks, ever. And the reason is that I'm kind of flying blind on them. Let me explain. Stephen is a total pro who's been around the block a few times. He's externed with Charlie Trotter and Thomas Keller (I think). He's been working for Michael Mina for over a decade, and is currently EC of Michael Mina's Seablue in Vegas, sous at Stripsteak before that. In fact, it kind of sounds like he's been Mina's go-to guy when it comes to maintaining the empire as of late. He's been around the right people, and I don't have the slightest doubt that he's going to be technically sound, a total pro, and that he'll be around late. Or at least late-ish. But what does he cook? Got me. Mina's food, I guess. And so you see why I look at the number two next to his name and kind of shake my head. Guess we'll find out if he can be a number one, or if he'll always be a number two. Um. You know what I mean.

1 Ed Quickfires
0
0
0
Last Week: n/a Eliminations
0
0
0

I'm similarly nervous about Ed. Holy cow, does this guy have a resume. CIA, Olives with Todd English, No. 9 Park with Barbara Lynch, executive sous at DB Bistro Moderne and Daniel with Daniel Boulud, a stint as EC of Veritas, BLT Market with Laurent Tourondel... he's had his ass kicked for many years by some very high-profile chefs. And he ALMOST escaped the Stephen trap, since he just launched Plein Sud with Frederick Lesort, so I can at least get a look at his menu. But Plein Sud is less than a month old, and there's precious little to read about it just yet. It's brasserie cuisine, and it looks pretty straightforward, but he just has to be rocking it. Has to be. Right? *fingers crossed*

Ladies and gentlemen, your Top Chef Season Seven contestants. May they not embarrass me.

A quick side note, now that we're out west, I'm going to be doing the postmortems on delay this season. It's not that we don't get the show the same time as everybody else. We do. It's just that dinnertime with two little kids isn't the best time to be concentrating on Top Chef. DVR is my friend, and I'm compelled to use it. But my intention, provided I remember, is to always post the thread before the show starts, so you guys can even yak as things develop if you like. And then I'll jump in a few hours later once I've had a chance to catch up. Starting Wednesday.

Discuss!

June 11, 2010

Tadich Grill

Tadich Grill Dominic Armato

You're on your own in San Francisco.

It's been a long day, your stomach's gnawing, and anyplace honest with a counter is sounding like a good idea. A restaurant that's been around for over 150 years can't have survived that long by playing to culinary trends -- were there culinary trends in 1849? -- so you brush past the fellows having a smoke on the sidewalk out front, open the door and step out of the rain-drenched night and into the bustle within.

The Long CounterDominic Armato

It isn't 1849, but it might as well be 1949. If you block out the less conservatively dressed patrons and the servers' terminals, you could pretend that Truman was still president, Don Newcombe was the NL rookie of the year and Tony Bennett was still Joe Bari. So you wait for a spell until a stool opens up at the satiny smooth wooden bar that starts at the front door and goes on forever, maybe all the way into the kitchen in back, maybe all the way into the bay. You take a sip of water and, under yellow light cast by ancient brass fixtures, start to look over a menu filled with the kind of simple seafood and steaks that meant the good life to your grandparents. Your waiter steps up, white jacket, black tie, slick hair, a face with experience, and though he works a busy counter he moves with economy and carries himself like a foreign dignitary. "Can I get you something to drink?", he says, sounding like he arrived here from Western Europe, but decades ago. You ask for a Diet Coke, to which he responds, "I said something to drink," with just enough of a wry tone and a twitch of the lip to keep it friendly. He glides off to retrieve your Coke. You're the boss, but it's his turf.

Seafood CocktailDominic Armato

You start to regret the selection. Something with bourbon somehow seems more appropriate as you soak in the scene. Folks who got off late unwind with an old-school cocktail. The walls are lined with trench coats and the counter lined with briefcases. A septuagenarian with earlobes like dried apricots -- a regular -- sits down to your left, orders and eats a minute steak with potatoes, pays his tab and hobbles off before your seafood cocktail even hits the counter. The seafood cocktail decided to dress for the occasion, wearing a perfectly trimmed lettuce leaf, purely for show, that frames a chaotic mix of bay shrimp, prawns and crab claws, cool and tender, still smelling of the sea. It's touched with just the right amount of cocktail sauce, a house blend that eschews ketchupy sweetness in favor of texture and fire, the tomato pulp still detectable, the horseradish wafting up into your nose before the fork passes your lips. It's simple and perfect and you sigh when you reach the bottom all too quickly. Your waiter raises an eyebrow and cracks the faintest smile as he whisks away the empty vessel. He won't ask what you thought of it. He already knows.

CioppinoDominic Armato

When he returns, he bears a wide, shallow bowl filled with a stew whose acquaintance you're anxious to make. The cioppino's a house special, and if you doubt the house's authority, the plate helpfully reminds you that the house was built, figuratively at least, in 1849. The seafood stew is bold and decidedly not of this era, made with heavily reduced tomatoes, dried herbs, what must have been every sea creature at the market and enough oil to carry their flavor. The first spoonful of wine-fortified soup hits your lips, and you're transfixed. It's deep and developed, almost bordering on dirty, with the essence -- no, the bold, unmitigated totality -- of the bounty of seafood that adorns the bowl. Clams, mussels, shrimp, crab, scallops, fish... they're all here, all with their own distinct flavors, all sweet and luscious and tender. You have bread to dunk. It isn't crusty, artisan bread, but rather thick slices of something light and moist, toasted to a faint crisp, basted with butter and garlic and absorbent like a sponge. You have to resist the urge to tear through the cioppino like a madman, but you manage to linger with it for a spell, making every spoonful count and using the bread to mop up afterwards. You couldn't have gotten anything more out of the bowl if you licked it. The dishwasher will pause for a moment, wondering how a clean bowl got mixed in with the dirty.

Bourbon Bread PuddingDominic Armato

You don't have room for dessert, but you're going to eat one anyway. Bourbon makes an appearance, allowing you to right an earlier wrong, steeped with caramel and basting a bread pudding that comes out of the kitchen without its cap. Your waiter walks it over to a free patch of countertop, reaches into a refrigerator below for a bottle of fresh whipped cream, lays a huge dollop on top of your dessert and, by accident, a small one on his fingertips. He glances over his shoulder, and in a flash, the misplaced cream disappears into his mouth before he turns and sets the dish before you. "Pudding" seems like even more of a misnomer than usual, with cubes of spongy bread and tender, cooked apple nearly unsullied by binder, held together, it would seem, by sheer force of will and the occasional raisin. It's sweet and delicious and you need coffee, so you order an espresso. But the machine behind the counter spits and belches and emits a few disconcerting noises, and after fiddling with it for a few minutes, your waiter declares it dead and sullenly informs you that drip coffee will have to do. "That's okay," you say, realizing that a plain old cup is more appropriate, and this was probably providence. An old mug is set before you, the coffee within is smooth, warm and easy to drink, and with three deep gulps, it's gone.

You pay the check, and as you struggle to stand, your waiter thanks you with a warm smile. He genuinely seems to mean it. Or he's a master at making you think so, which is really all the same to you. You work your way to the front of the narrow building, another lone body falling in to take your place. You step back into the cool night, stand in the neon light and take a deep breath. A cab pulls up and asks if you need a ride. And even though you get in, you think to yourself that he arrived too soon. You really would have liked a few more minutes.

Tadich Grill
www.tadichgrill.com
240 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-391-1849
Mon - Fri11:00 AM - 9:30 PM
Sat11:30 AM - 9:30 PM

June 09, 2010

Top Chef Masters - S2E10 Postmortem

You know, I never would have thought I'd find myself in this position, but by the time they sauntered up to critics table, I was a surprised to discover that I had absolutely no horse in this race. I loved all three of them. Loved their personalities, loved their stories, and would have loved to try their dishes. Well, I did try one of them. And I loved it. But we'll get to that.

Congratulations to Marcus Samuelsson. As expected, that was one heck of a compelling story. And in some ways, I find his success twice as impressive, given that he was working in not one but two culinary traditions that are a stretch for most Western diners. First off, I have to say, I've had that foie gras ganache, and it's incredible. And whichever diner used the word "genius" to describe it is right on. You know Jean-George Vongerichten's molten center chocolate cake that's been copied -- poorly -- everywhere? Think that, but made of foie. When I called it one of the best foie dishes I've ever tasted in the comments a couple of weeks back, I phrased it like that simply because I try not to declare winners in these sorts of things. It's one of those dishes that's a perfect intersection of brilliant creativity, technical mastery and jaw-dropping flavor, and the moment I saw that he was busting it out, I knew it was going to rock the table. Another thing that I loved about Samuelsson's meal is this idea that he's acting as an ambassador of African cuisine, trying to introduce it to the West. I have his cookbook, The Soul of a New Cuisine, and while it's always been fascinating to me on an intellectual level, since I know so little about African foods, seeing his connection to it, and how passionate he is about rediscovering his roots, that makes it downright moving as well. I know which cookbook I'll be perusing for dinners the next couple of weeks.

It's a bit of a tangent, but Rick Bayless, classy as always, said something that I loved, and that touched directly on something I've been thinking about a lot lately. In a modern internet food culture that's so opinion-based, it's refreshing to see a true master happy to simply step up and say that it's hard for him to get his head around a dish because he just doesn't know enough about the tradition that inspires it. It's a good reminder that for those who are passionate about food, the focus should always be on what you don't know rather than what you do. It's an old, old universal theme, but I love the idea that true mastery is a commitment to always improving, always learning, and always being curious about what you don't know. After growing up in Sweden and becoming an internationally recognized master of modern Scandinavian cuisine, it seems like he had a true epiphany, shifted gears, and suddenly devoted himself to learning all about a culinary tradition that while no less connected to him personally, must have been incredibly alien to him given how long he'd been away from Africa. If not for that curiosity, that openness, that desire not to rest on his laurels but rather to throw himself into the unknown and start all over again, is there any doubt that it would have been Moonen or Lee to earn the title rather than him?

I really do enjoy this series, and in particular, I love these final episodes. Here's hoping they come back to do it again.

I Need Help

Italian Beef @ Chicago Hamburger Co. Dominic Armato

I... uh... get a little riled up about Italian Beef sometimes.

Let me be the first to state that this is my problem. At the risk of repeating myself, the Italian Beef is a noble foodstuff, pure of form yet deep in its subtle complexities. It languishes in the shadow of pizza and hot dogs in Chicago, where I've encountered lifelong natives who have never tried one. Italian Beef sandwiches bring me joy. It's a joy I wish to share. Which I suppose makes me something of an Italian Beef evangelist.

So last week, a review of the new-ish Scottsdale Al's, which I hit myself a couple of months ago, graced the New Times. It was not well-received. I can buy that. While I thought Al's Scottsdale was entirely worthy, it's not up to the original Al's on Taylor in Chicago. And even Al's in Chicago, though a venerated city institution, is something of a lightning rod among Chicago beef enthusiasts. Most good beef places put their own little spin on the sandwich... a subtle shift in seasoning, an atypical giardiniera, an unconventional roll... you have to make your mark somehow. But Al's stretches some of the conventions awfully far, and their Italian Beef is known as a love it or hate it thing.

So I'm thinking, okay, it didn't go over with the author, who apparently spent some indeterminate amount of time living in Chicago, and that's all fine and good, even if I thought a couple of the criticisms were a little odd. But the piece closed by recommending Chicago Hamburger Co. as an alternative. The same Chicago Hamburger Co. that I completely wrote off for Italian Beef on -- quite literally -- my fourth day here in Phoenix, before we'd even moved into the house. So let me start this off by saying, Laura Hahnefeld, if you're reading this, I owe you an apology. I tried to send it via e-mail, but it's getting bounced for some reason. Floored by a piece that put CHC above Al's -- way above Al's -- I posted a rather lengthy comment that I'd intended to be feisty but friendly, and I think it was... right up until the sentence fourth from the end, which was really uncalled for. And in all seriousness, I'm sorry for that. It wasn't a very nice thing to say.

Cup of Juice?Dominic Armato

And partially by means of apology, I went back to give them a second shot. It's true that even the best Italian Beef joints sometimes have consistency issues, and I figured that in light of a strong buy from somebody who calls herself "fry girl," I'd better give it one more go. And I'm upgrading my assessment! But not much. The beef I had today was, indeed, leagues better than the one I had the first week of January. But it's still a pretty lousy beef sandwich. The strongest point on this pass was the beef itself which, though not roasted on-site, was perfectly edible. Far from the peak of beefiness, tender if a little dry, but of decent run-of-the-mill quality. (As a side note, there are some pretty good beef stands in Chicago that don't roast their own, but it's a steeper hill to climb, and the best do it in-house.) But really, the rest was so very, very wrong.

You need look no further than the photo above for the first major problem. I ordered my beef sweet, hot and wet, and both times, my wet arrived in a cup on the side. This is not a French Dip, people! Pouring or dipping bite by bite is not a substitute for dunking the entire sandwich in a vat of juice that's been simmering for hours! But it was immediately evident why it was done this way, because the roll is a weak piece of fluff by Italian Beef standards. You say Al's bread went gummy when saturated with juice? Actually, I consider that a good thing. But even presuming that you don't, gummy beats liquid, which is what happens with CHC's roll. It completely falls apart with the introduction of even a modest amount of juice. If the sandwich were held with a pair of tongs and dunked in a tray of juice as is the convention, I'm betting half the sandwich would be left behind in the tray. And it's a roll with two ends, which is wrong. This, incidentally, is one of the things that Al's in Scottsdale gets wrong as well, though at least their roll has body. An Italian Beef has to soak up the juice, and when it's made from a single roll, the sandwich resists the moisture rather than wicking it right up. Again, in the case of CHC, this might actually be a good thing, because I don't think the bread could take it. It couldn't take half of that little plastic tub of juice without completely going to pieces, much less go for a swim like its Chicago brethren. And the juice. Better than I remember it, but still weak, and absolutely overpowered by black pepper. The complaint was levied that Al's juice cloaked the traditional Italian seasonings. But they aren't cloaked at Al's. It's that Al's doesn't do the "traditional" seasoning. Never did. Not even at the Al's on Taylor in Chicago. The exact blend of what's in there is a closely-guarded secret that I imagine is guarded even more closely now that they're franchising, but while cloves are generally accepted as one of the wonky spices you'll find only on an Al's Italian Beef, cinnamon has been floated, cardamom, and a horde of others. Yeah, it's a weird, atypical sandwich that isn't garlic and oregano heavy. That's what Al's is and always has been. But for what it is, I think it's very good... it mostly depends on how much of a purist you are. And the fact that Al's is one of the pioneers of Italian Beef makes it difficult to say they're somehow doing it wrong, even if they march to their own beat, so to speak. Back at CHC, however, my sandwich was supposed to have sweet peppers, and I suppose it did, but they were teeny tiny little specimens and total mush. And the giardiniera that you seem to love, Laura... well... I just don't get it. It's made in-house, and that's great, except it's bad. It's crudely chopped (and I don't equate coarsely with crudely) with very little oil and waaaaaay too much vinegar. Giardiniera is, admittedly, one of the primary ways for an Italian Beef stand to make their mark with something distinctive, but if you ask me, going the heavy vinegar route is just a bad, bad call. It kills the flavor of the beef. It dominates the flavor of the beef rather than complementing it. An oily giardiniera carries the heat, carries the beefy flavor and add succulence to the sandwich. This was like taking my Italian Beef with a vinegar chaser.

Now, lest I give the impression that I think poor Bob Pappanduros, CHC's proprietor, should be dragged out in the street and shot, I really like Chicago Hamburger Co.! They make a pretty darn good dog and the sliders, even if I'm not sure how they're a Chicago thing, are great. It's tough to do Italian Beef well unless you're doing a lot of it. And it's hard to do a lot of it unless that's really your thing. And at CHC, it's one of many, many things. With Italian Beef, it's almost impossible to do it halfway. I'm sympathetic to Mr. Pappanduros' plight, even if it doesn't change my opinion about the sandwich.

So what's a beef evangelist to do? Resurrect the Beef-Off, that's what. I'd hoped to spend at least a year exploring the local foodstuffs before seeking out the comforts of home, but as with places I encountered in Baltimore and Boston, it hurts me to know that for many, this is the local standard-bearer for the Italian Beef sandwich. So after I clear my plate of a couple of other grub-related projects I'm trying to work my way through, a-beefing we will go.

To that end, I'm taking requests. I've found five or six places just driving around, but I need at least ten. Better to have a dozen. And I know there are more out there. Good, bad... doesn't matter. If a place serves an Italian Beef sandwich, I want to know about it, and I'd greatly appreciate any help folks would care to provide in making a comprehensive hit list.

I'll check back in a couple of months. And if you'd care to join me, Fry Girl, drop me a line... really! :-)

Chicago Hamburger Co.
www.chicagohamburger.com
3749 E. Indian School Rd.
Phoenix, AZ 85018
602-955-4137
Mon - Sat10:30 AM - 8:00 PM