PLEASE READ BEFORE COMMENTING!!!
There's a lot of sneaky intel out there, but I'm endeavoring to keep this blog a spoiler-free zone. This isn't just for the readers, but for me, too -- I don't want to know what happens! As such, anything that's already been broadcast or has been posted on the official Bravo site is fair game for discussion. I will, for example, discuss the preview of next week's show at the end of the post. But if you've heard rumors that one chef has been hosting a lot of dinner parties, or that another chef was spotted boarding a plane to an exotic locale, please keep them to yourself... thanks!
And so, it comes down to three. The right three, no less. This is the culmination of what it's hard to refute is, culinarily speaking, the strongest season to date. The contestant just eliminated, according to Gail, was the strongest female chef the series has seen.
So the question becomes, who has the edge in the freeform "give us your best shot" finale?
The recipe for Top Chef success has, to my mind, remained fairly constant since the show's inception. Over the course of the season, the game changes a little bit -- morphs slowly, as it were -- especially so as we head into the finals. In the early stages, it's all about technique. Who can cook a piece of beef, who can make a simple sauce, who can season their food, and who can't? In the early running, it doesn't really matter what you make. As long as you make it well, you'll stick around. Then, as the folks who are lacking in the skills department are slowly picked off, creativity comes more into play. Who can do interesting things with their skills? Who can combine flavors and textures to make their food notable and compelling? Who can surprise and delight the judges? The contestants who have a hard time using their creativity to adapt to the challenge at hand, or those who find themselves mimicing those around them are usually the next to go. But now, we're at the very end. At this point, it should be established that everybody who's still standing can do interesting things and do them well (if, sometimes, with varying degrees of consistency). So in a season when the finale is chock-full of creative, talented chefs, how do you distinguish between them? Perhaps more than in any previous season, I'd have thought we'd hear talk of the final element -- that thing that puts a winner over the top. And that is, which chef is executing a mature, personal style? For those who see artistry in cooking rather than simply a highly-honed craft (though we won't start that old debate right now), the question becomes which chefs sometimes produce art, and which are artists, with a strong and clearly-defined voice? It's no longer enough to make a great dish. Everybody will (should) be making great dishes. It has to be a great Kevin dish, or a great Michael dish, and the judges will want to feel as though they could recognize it anywhere. In the finale, they're going to be looking to name a winner who isn't just good, but who is also unique.
At least that's how it's always been.
But something this past week made me wonder. The judges were incredibly picky. Exceedingly picky. With such a strong field, it's almost as though they raised the bar so high that even the tiniest misstep could simply take you out of contention. So will the winner be the one who manages not to make even the tiniest mistake? Will the title go to the master technician rather than the master visionary? I'm really not sure. Before this past episode, I would have called it effectively a two-horse race with a potential spoiler. Bryan makes great food, yes, but Kevin and Michael have been the ones with a clear voice, an identifiable style, and the wow factor. This week, Mike put out two dishes that twisted and thrilled the judges' brains. Kevin blew them away by doing so much with so little in his vegetarian dish. But who won? The guy whose work was seemingly less interesting, but closer to flawless. And to me, that throws everything into question.
It also makes the finale a whole lot harder to handicap. But let's do this. Let's presume, for a moment, that all three bring their A game tonight, and let's look at what they've done over the course of the season to wow the judges:
The power rankings are not purely a prediction of who is most likely to win, or an assessment of last episode's dishes, or a reflection of the contestants' historical performance, but rather a nebulous amalgam of all three, combined with a little bit of gut feeling, to provide a relative measure of current awesomeness.
| 1 |
Kevin |
|
Quickfires |
4 |
7 |
0 |
| Last Week: 1 |
|
Eliminations |
5 |
9 |
1 |
Kevin announced himself early, winning the inaugural elimination challenge with his oil-poached arctic char with turnip salsa verde. To go with his escargot, he made a candied bacon jam that Tom set upon reverse-engineering the moment he returned home. After a small stumble with mole, he took the bull by the horns and won with a deconstructed version of the one of the world's most complex sauces. Late in the season, he went on a tear, bringing out simple flavors left and right, winning with his pork pate and vegetarian dish. And in the Bocuse d'Or challenge, though his dish wasn't the most interesting, he won for executing it perfectly (sense a theme, here?). Kevin makes food that plays simple and rustic but has a lot going on under the hood, and simply tastes great. It's a style that might be called conservative when compared to previous winners, but it's also a style that, in terms of culinary trends, is approaching or at its apex of popularity, and we've never had anybody execute it at this level.
|
| 2 |
Michael V. |
|
Quickfires |
2 |
4 |
1 |
| Last Week: 2 |
|
Eliminations |
3 |
9 |
1 |
Michael's history this season has been a mix of bold failures and mind-blowing successes, sometimes within the same dish. He rocked episode two, getting one win and a heap of raised eyebrows for his nitro gazpacho and his apple and goat cheese sorbets. For the Air Force challenge, he was operating on a different plane, turning out a dish far more sophisticated in appearance than the judges thought possible given the constraints. His mustard noodles wowed the French luminaries, his dashi with miso-cured black cod stood out on the ranch amid cowboy fare, and his deconstructed Caesar was praised for its incredible precision. He dominated restaurant wars, pulling off a pair of dishes that wowed the judges and anchored what Tom called the best RW showing to date. He did wild things with chicken wings, the right simple things with grape leaves and vines, and he produced a couple of near misses that still left the judges wide-eyed. Michael's the wild man who brings shock and awe and delights even the most jaded palates. He makes believers of judges who might ordinarily be suspicious of his style of cuisine. When he's on, he's ON.
|
| 3 |
Bryan |
|
Quickfires |
0 |
3 |
3 |
| Last Week: 3 |
|
Eliminations |
4 |
8 |
0 |
Bryan, to me, is the enigma. There's no questioning his talent. But he started out with some Michael-esque wow factor before slowly drifting into a more quiet excellence. His early-season successes, like his sweet and sour guacamole macaroon and meat-glued trout with deconstructed Hollandaise had Tom swooning. Then, all of a sudden, it's like he switched gears, going more traditional and winning at the cowboy cookout before leaving the winner's circle for a long time, reemerging only this week with very straightforward dishes that were executed almost flawlessly. Which chef is he? Which one shows up in the finale? The reason I still can't put him above Michael is that I'm still not sure, and the "zany technique with traditional flavors" angle that he was rocking early in the season seems to have fallen by the wayside, and wins or no wins, the judges haven't seemed as excited about his food since episodes two and four. He hasn't showed that easily pigeonholed style in weeks. And yet, there he is, winning the first part of the finale if not on style, then on points. What to think?
|
| 4 |
Jennifer C. |
|
Quickfires |
4 |
6 |
3 |
| Last Week: 5 |
|
Eliminations |
1 |
5 |
3 |
Wow, I can't remember the last time somebody seemed to devastated on their way out the door. I'm not talking simply a matter of water works, but the look of somebody who is really, truly struggling with the fact that she went home when she did. It's hard to watch. But it's also hard to argue that if one of the four horsemen had to be left out of the finale, it shouldn't have been her. That midseason lull was long and brutal, and she never quite seemed to hit the heights of the other three. But it's also amazing to consider that despite that, she might've been considered the favorite three or four out of six seasons. It only further illustrates the strength of this season's class. But that's the downside of having such a great collection of chefs. Except for one, all of them have to go home at some point.
|
No divining details from the previews this week. I just want to see this one play out. But I'm intensely curious about how it will. I feel like I don't know which angle the judges will take. If they take that route that they have so many times before -- which chef is articulating a mature, personal vision? -- then it's a close call between Kevin and Michael, with the edge going to Kevin because of his remarkable consistency and greater culinary trends, despite the understanding that small slip-ups by either could tilt the balance. But if they judge like they did last week, where simply not making those small errors can allow you to win a TKO on points, then suddenly Bryan is right in the mix. And then there's the wildcard scenario, where the very technique-forward early season Bryan suddenly reappears, in which case it's a total toss-up no matter how they judge. The only thing certain, I think, is that it truly is anybody's game, and I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see any of the three walking home with the title.
So in what is rapidly becoming traditional fashion, no rooting for any chef in particular. Here's simply hoping that everybody truly gets in their best shot, and let the chips fall where they may.
Discuss!!!
Comments